• 2022 ACA Affordability Threshold Released

    In order to avoid a Shared Responsibility Payment under the ACA, employers must offer affordable, minimum value coverage to full-time employees. Coverage is considered “affordable” if the employee contribution is below a specified percentage of income for each employee.

    The IRS has announced the 2022 indexing adjustments for the affordability threshold. This was released in Rev. Proc. 2021-36.

     

    2022 Affordability Threshold

    The new affordability threshold for 2022 is 9.61%. This is a reduction from the 2021 affordability threshold, which was 9.83%.

    Employers who use the Federal Poverty Level safe harbor (as opposed to Rate of Pay or W2 safe harbors) will now be restricted to lowest cost employee only contributions of $103.14 per month in 2022. As a reminder, certain other stipends or surcharges must be included in the affordability determination.

     

    Of Note for Employers

    Employers typically cross reference these affordability threshold percentages in designing contributions such that Shared Responsibility Payments can be avoided. Of note, since the threshold was reduced for 2022, if wages were to remain level, maximum contributions may actually be reduced.

     

    Enhanced Premium Tax Credit (for Individuals)

    The enhanced premium tax credit applies to individuals with Exchange coverage. While this does not directly impact employers, the expansion of the credit is worth noting for employers who have employees that are not eligible for employer sponsored coverage.

    The ACA premium tax credit was expanded by the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) for taxable years 2021 and 2022. Under standard rules, the tax credit is limited to taxpayers with household income between 100% and 400% of the federal poverty line.

    ARPA eliminated the upper income limit for eligibility and increased the amount of the premium tax credit. The revised calculations decreased the percentage of household income that individuals must contribute for Exchange coverage (in all income bands). The 2022 percentage ranges from zero to 8.5%. This reflects the percentage of household income that recipients of the tax credit must pay for Exchange coverage. This is a substantial reduction from prior year percentages (which were 2.06% to 9.78% for 2020 and 2.07% to 9.83% for 2021). Special enhancements to the credit are also included for individuals receiving unemployment compensation in 2021.

  • The No Surprises Act Explained

    The No Surprises Act (NSA) was enacted in December 2020 as part of the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021. The rule bans the practice of surprise-billing for out-of-network medical care, including from air ambulance providers, hospitals, facilities, and individual providers.

    Surprise billing happens when patients unknowingly get care from providers that are outside of their health plan's network. The law outlines new requirements and restrictions for many billing situations; however, the major focus on the bill is on three major categories of care, those where patients are most vulnerable to surprise billing.

    • Emergency Care - At Out-of-Network Facilities: Surprise billing often occurs in an emergency care situation where patients have little or no choice in where they receive care. Examples of this would be emergency care at a non-participating hospital or air ambulance services furnished by a non-network provider.
    • Ancillary Care – By Out-of-Network Providers at In-Network Facilities: Surprise billing can also occur in non-emergency care situations when patients at an in-network hospital or other facility receives care from ancillary providers (such as anesthesiologists or radiologists) who are not in-network and whom patients do not specifically choose.
    • Air Ambulance: Air ambulance services are usually furnished by nonparticipating providers, and the service is called upon when patients have essentially no choice of provider.

    The problem of “balance billing” occurs when a provider charges a patient the remainder of what their insurance does not pay. This practice is currently prohibited by both Medicare and Medicaid. The No Surprises Act extends similar protections to insureds covered under employer-sponsored and individual health plans.
     

    New Guidance

    On July 1, 2021, the DOL, HHS, and the IRS released the first round of guidance (Interim Final Rule) prescribing regulatory requirements pursuant to surprise medical billing. Broadly, the guidance puts prescriptive rules into place to protect individuals from surprise medical bills, and details how providers will navigate these rules behind the scenes.

    In short, the new rules clarify that patients are only responsible for their in-network cost-sharing amounts in emergency situations and certain non-emergency situations where they do not have the ability to affirmatively choose an in-network provider.
     

    Highlights

    Following is a summary of the key provisions of the guidance:

    • In-Network Cost Sharing: Cost-sharing (deductible or coinsurance) for out-of-network services that fall within the surprise billing protections are limited to in-network levels. That means patient cost-sharing cannot be higher than if the services were provided by an in-network provider.
    • Counts Toward In-Network OOP: Applicable cost-sharing (deductible or coinsurance) must count toward in-network deductibles and out-of-pocket maximums.
    • All Emergency Care In-Network: Emergency services, regardless of where they are provided, must be treated as if it were provided on in-network basis.
    • No Pre-Authorization: The practice of requiring a prior authorization for emergency services is prohibited.
    • Ancillary Care at In-Network Rates: Out-of-network charges for ancillary care (such as an anesthesiologist or assistant surgeon) provided at an in-network facility is prohibited in all circumstances.
    • No Balance Billing: The practice of balance billing (when providers seek to collect more than the applicable cost sharing amount from the patient) is banned.
    • Notice Required When OON Provider is Selected: When a patient voluntarily seeks care at an out-of-network provider, the provider/facility must provide patients with a plain-language consumer notice. The notice must explain that patient consent is required before that provider can bill at out-of-network rate (and collect any balance billed amount).
       

    Effective Date and Applicability

    The new law becomes effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2022. It applies to nearly all private health plans offered by employers (including grandfathered group health plans) as well as individual health insurance policies offered through the Marketplace or directly through insurance carriers.
     

    More Details . . .

    The following sections provide a deeper dive into the details of the guidance for those who prefer a more in-depth review.
     

    Emergency Services Provided by Out-of-Network Providers

    If a nonparticipating provider (for example, an anesthesiologist or assistant surgeon) provides services at a participating facility or at a nonparticipating emergency facility, the provider may not bill beyond an allowed cost-sharing amount (essentially, the in-network levels).

    In addition to specifying the payment constraint, the guidance also prescribed a specific process by which providers are paid. Within 30 days from when the provider submits a bill to a plan, the plan must determine an initial payment and directly pay the provider or issue a notice of denial. (The regulations clarify that this “initial payment” does not refer to a first installment, but rather the amount that the plan or insurer reasonably intends as payment in full.)

    If the provider disagrees with the plan’s payment, the parties may begin a 30-day open negotiation period. If the parties fail to reach an agreement, the plan or provider has four days to notify the other party and the HHS that they are initiating an Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) process. The No Surprises Act prescribed the details of this process, including the IDR as the final solution.
     

    Can Surprise Billing Protections be Waived?

    There are differences in how the guidance treats whether a patient may waive their surprise billing protections. These distinctions are useful in understanding the specific (and narrow) circumstances under which additional cost-sharing and balance billing can be applied.

    Out-of-Network Emergency Care

    Types of Care:

    • Emergency Room Care
    • Air Ambulance Services
     

    Involuntary Ancillary Care at Out-of-Network Facilities

    Types of Care:

    Circumstances where a patient does not have control over the choice of provider:

    • Emergency medicine
    • Anesthesiology
    • Pathology
    • Radiology
    • Neonatology
    • Diagnostic services (including radiology and laboratory services)
    • Assistant surgeons
    • Hospitalists
    • Intensivists
    • Nonparticipating providers at a facility where there is no participating provider who can furnish the necessary item or service

    Right to Waive:

    No. Protections can never be waived. Notice and consent provisions cannot be used under any circumstances.
     

    Voluntary Ancillary Care at Out-of-Network Facilities/Providers

    Types of Care:

    Circumstances where a patient has a meaningful choice as to whether to select a nonparticipating provider:

    • Other services (not listed above)
    • Nonemergency care where the patient elects a specific specialist
    • Care provided where additional cost sharing and balance billing amounts are not a “surprise” because a patient knowingly and purposefully seeks care from the nonparticipating provider

    Right to Waive:

    Yes. Protections can be waived if the patient agrees to receive nonemergency care from certain nonparticipating providers. Notice and consent provisions must be followed.
     

    Cost-Sharing Amounts

    Participants in group health plans will pay cost-sharing for items and services that fall within the No Surprises Act’s scope based on the “recognized amount,” which generally will be the lesser of the “qualifying payment amount” (QPA) (i.e., the plan’s median in-network rate for an item or service) and the amount billed by the provider.
     

    What is the Qualifying Payment Amount?

    The Qualifying Payment Amount (QPA) is an amount paid to a non-participating provider as determined by the plan or insurer. Generally, it is the median of all the plan or insurer’s contracted rates from January 31, 2019, for a given item or service in that geographic region, increased for inflation. The QPA affects patient cost sharing in many instances and is a key factor for arbitrators to consider if and when payment disputes are resolved through the IDR process.
     

    Accurate Provider Network Directories

    Health plans must update their provider directory at least every 90 days. They also must respond within one business day to requests from individuals about whether a provider or facility is in-network. Lastly, consumers who rely on incorrect information conveyed by plans or posted in directories are entitled to have services covered with in-network cost-sharing applied.
     

    Continuity of Care

    The No Surprises Act also includes a provision that requires health plans to notify enrollees when a provider/facility leaves the plan network while it is providing ongoing care. In certain circumstances, health plans must provide transitional coverage for up to 90 days or until treatment ends (whichever is earlier) at in-network rates.

    The continuity of care requirement applies to treatment for serious or complex health conditions, institutional or inpatient care, nonelective surgery, pregnancy, and care for patients with terminal illnesses.
     

    Advanced Explanation of Benefits

    Beginning in 2022, patients can request advance information about how services will be covered before they are provided. For scheduled services, if a request is submitted, the health plan must provide written information including whether the provider/facility participates in-network and a good faith estimate of what the plan will pay and what patient cost liability may be. Generally, this information must be provided to the patient within three business days.
     

    Notice and Consent Exception

    Providers furnishing non-emergency services where the patient voluntarily elects to seek care out-of-network must provide notice and receive written consent from the patient in order to be exempt from the NSA’s balance-billing and cost-sharing restrictions. The nonparticipating provider generally has 72 hours before the service is delivered to obtain the patient’s consent. The process can be executed either in paper or electronic form, but notice must be provided to patients, and patients must provide consent in advance of services in order for the provider to apply out-of-network cost sharing and/or balance bill for any services. To enable a plan or insurer to apply cost-sharing correctly, a provider relying on the notice and consent exception must timely notify the plan or insurer and provide the plan or insurer a signed copy of the binding notice and consent documents.
     

    Model Notice

    A model notice is provided for plans and insurers to post and include in all explanations of benefits to which the No Surprises Act applies. The regulations outline the process for providing the notice, which is intended to serve as good faith compliance with the NSA requirement that, beginning in 2022, a plan or insurer must disclose the prohibition on surprise billing and the entities to contact in the event of a violation.


     

  • Small Group Renewal Fundamentals and Strategies [Video]

    Startups and small organizations (those with under 100 employees) face a unique set of challenges when designing competitive, impactful, and cost-conscious employee benefits programs. How can your benefits help attract talent in a hyper-competitive market? How do you create long-term goals while answering short-term needs? What solutions exist to help you do the job of many? Join us for an in-depth strategy session all about building an effective benefits program that works hard for your small business and your people. In this pre-recorded webinar, we cover:

    • Recruiting and Attracting Talent
    • Rating structure and strategy
    • Long Range Goals
    • Carrier Market
    • Tech Solutions
    • Small Group Landscape
    • Location, remote work force
    • Participation
    • Ancillary Coverage
    • Role of the broker
  • More ARPA Premium Subsidy Guidance

    The IRS has issued additional guidance (Notice 2021-46) related to ARPA premium subsidies. Much of the guidance is very detailed and applicable to narrow situations. However, several questions are more widely applicable. Following is a summary of the items that would be of general interest to most employers.

    ARPA Subsidy for Longer-than-18-Month COBRA Events

    If the original qualifying event was a reduction in hours or an involuntary termination of employment, the COBRA subsidy is available to an individual who is entitled to elect COBRA continuation coverage for an extended period due to a disability determination, second qualifying event, or an extension under State mini-COBRA. The extended period of coverage must fall between April 1, 2021 and September 30, 2021. However, the subsidy is available even if the individual had not notified the plan or insurer of the intent to elect extended COBRA continuation coverage before the start of that period.

    Disqualifying Coverage

    Eligibility for the COBRA subsidy ends when an Assistance Eligible Individual becomes eligible for coverage under any other disqualifying group health plan or Medicare. This is true even if the other coverage does not include all of the benefits provided by the previously elected COBRA continuation coverage. For example, eligibility for Medicare, which generally does not provide vision or dental coverage, ends eligibility for the premium subsidy related to all previously elected COBRA continuation coverage.

    Controlled Groups

    If a plan subject to Federal COBRA covers employees of who are members of a controlled group, each employer that is a member of the controlled group is the premium payee entitled to claim the COBRA subsidy with respect to its employees or former employees. Although all of the members of a controlled group are treated as a single employer for employee benefit purposes, each is a separate employer for employment tax purposes.

    Business Reorganization

    In the event of a business reorganization (stock or asset sale), if the selling group remains obligated to make COBRA coverage available to M&A qualified beneficiaries, the entity in the selling group that maintains the group health plan is the premium payee entitled to claim the COBRA subsidy. If the employer (which may be an entity in the buying group) is not obligated to make COBRA continuation coverage available to Assistance Eligible Individuals, the employer is not entitled to the COBRA subsidy after the business reorganization.

  • Supreme Court Upholds ACA for Third Time

    On June 17, 2021, the United States Supreme Court effectively upheld the Affordable Care Act by ruling that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the case to court. This 7-2 vote was the third time the Supreme Court ruled to uphold the Affordable Care Act. 

    The ruling preserves the current provisions of the law, which was enacted by Congress in 2010. More information about the case and key arguments can be found in our prior blog post. The Court’s formal opinions are posted here.  

    Political opinions aside, we expect many employers and insurers to consider this good news; any changes to the Affordable Care Act would create additional administrative burden for an industry already focused on implementing recent legal changes that support pandemic recovery, as well as stabilizing increased costs.  

  • Form 941 Updated to Reflect ARPA Tax Credits

    Updated Form 941

    The IRS has released an updated draft of the 2021 Form 941, the Employer’s Quarterly Federal Tax Return. This updated draft now includes fields for taking a tax credit for ARPA COBRA subsidies.

    Quick ARPA Recap

    ARPA provides for a 100% COBRA subsidy for eligible individuals who experience a reduction in hours or an involuntary termination of employment. The potential subsidy period runs from April 1, 2021 through September 30, 2021 (subject to the regular end date of COBRA coverage). Logistically, Assistance Eligible Individuals are “deemed” to have paid their COBRA premiums, and employers are then entitled to take a tax credit for the subsidized COBRA premiums.

    How To Claim the Tax Credit

    Employers claim the tax credit for the subsidized (deemed paid, but not actually received) COBRA premiums on the quarterly Form 941. Credits are available against the employer portion of Medicare taxes owed. If insufficient Medicare taxes are owed, employers claim against future Medicare tax liability.

    Notable Fields on New Form

    Line 11(e): Fill in non-refundable credits. These are credits taken directly against the employer portion of Medicare taxes that is owed.

    Line 11(f): Fill in the number of Individuals for whom a COBRA premium subsidy was provided.

    Line 13(d): Fill in refundable credits. These are credits which are claimed against a future Medicare tax liability. The refundable portion of the credit is allowed after the employer share of Medicare tax is reduced to zero by nonrefundable credits.

    Timing

    The quarter ending June 30, 2021 will be the first period for which employers can claim credit for ARPA COBRA subsidies. Employers should plan on confirming that their COBRA administrator will be providing documentation of the total ARPA subsidy amount and the number of ARPA subsidized individuals.

  • 2020 San Francisco HCSO Reporting Requirement Waived

    Earlier this month, the City of San Francisco waived the 2020 reporting requirement for the Health Care Security and Fair Chance Ordinances. This marks the second year in a row that the reporting requirement has been waived due to the Public Health Emergency. This is welcome relief for employers who employ workers in the City and County of San Francisco.

    As a reminder, this reporting reprieve does not waive the requirement to comply with all other aspects of the ordinances. If you have questions about your need to comply, please reach out to your Vita Account Manager.

  • Washington State New Long-Term Care Trust Tax

    Starting January 1, 2022, employees who work in the state of Washington will pay a mandatory 0.58% payroll tax on all W-2 income with no cap. This tax will fund a state-run long-term care insurance program which can provide up to a maximum of $36,500 of long-term care benefits for care provided in the state. This equates to a daily benefit of $100 per day for one year. There is a provision to increase the benefit. However, benefit increases will track with the Washington CPI. The tax will increase as income increases since there is no cap to the tax.

    Eligibility Details

    To be eligible for benefits, employees must have paid into the system for three years within the past six years or for a total of 10 years with at least five of those years paid without interruption. Benefits can only be received if you reside in Washington state.

    Opt Out Option

    Employees can opt out of this tax permanently if a) they own their own long-term care insurance policy, and b) if they can attest that the plan provides benefits equal to or better than the state program. The long-term care insurance must be in place by November 1, 2021. This attestation must be submitted to the state’s Employment Security Department between October 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022.

    Who Should Consider a Private LTC Policy?

    Arguably, there are three groups of employees who may benefit from considering a private long-term care insurance policy:

    1. Employees who earn $300,000 or more in annual compensation. Most employees in this income bracket can find a policy that is more cost effective than the payroll tax.
    2. Employees who plan to move out of the state of Washington when they retire because they will forfeit the benefit.
    3. Employees who plan to retire in the next few years since they will not have vested benefits through the state.

    Employer Action

    If you have employees in Washington and would like to consider a long-term care benefit, provide a resource for employees, or explore an executive carve-out, please reach out to your Vita Account Manager. We will do an assessment to confirm the best options and course of action.

  • Healthcare and Employee Benefits in the Biden Era [Video]

    With the ongoing global pandemic and a new administration, legislative priorities continue to shift and are causing confusion for many employers. Join James Slotnick, Sun Life’s AVP of Government Relations, as he discusses how these dynamics could impact the employee benefits industry. He covers:

    • Ongoing legislative response to COVID-19
    • How Congress has both advanced and hindered President Biden’s priorities
    • Which employee benefits issues are likely to be most impacted by the Biden Administration
    • How the 2022 mid-terms could change President Biden’s agenda

    Note: The content of this presentation is not to be considered legal advice. We recommend Clients speak with legal counsel specializing in labor and employment law to ensure your organization meets requirements.

     

     

  • PPE Now Eligible As Medical Expense

    The IRS released Announcement 2021-7 which newly includes amounts paid for Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) as qualified medical expenses.

    Which Types of PPE are eligible?

    PPE such as masks, hand sanitizer, and sanitizing wipes are now eligible. The announcement does specify that the primary purpose of the PPE must be to prevent the spread of COVID-19.

    Which Plans?

    Technically, PPE was added as qualified medical expenses under IRC §213. Practically, this means that they are eligible under health FSAs, HSAs, and HRAs (if the HRA is structured to allow expenses beyond copays, deductibles, etc.).

    Effective Date

    Plans can be amended retroactively to January 1, 2020. To the extent that plans do not need to be formally amended, claims for PPE expenses would be eligible retroactively as well.

    Plan Amendments

    The IRS notice outlines that plans (including health FSAs and HRAs) need to be amended if they specifically prohibit reimbursement of PPE. Vita Flex Summary Plan Descriptions (SPDs) reference IRC §213 for eligible expense determinations, so Vita Flex plans will not require a specific amendment. Other plan communication materials currently list PPE as not eligible, so those materials will simply be updated by Vita.

    If a non-Vita Flex plan would need to be formally amended, the amendment can be retroactive. Such an amendment must be adopted no later than December 31, 2022 (in most circumstances).

    Participant Communication

    Employers should communicate the change in PPE eligibility. The Vita Flex participant portal is being updated with a banner to reflect this change in eligibility.

    No Double Dipping on Tax Return

    If the expense is reimbursed under an account-based plan, it is not deductible for the taxpayer under Section 213 (to the extent that the total medical expenses exceed 7.5% of the taxpayer’s adjusted gross income). In other words, no double dipping on the deductible expenses.