web
You’re offline. This is a read only version of the page.
close
Go tothe  Vita Companies Home Page
  • Solutions
    • Employee Benefits
    • COBRA
    • Pre-Tax Administration
    • Retirement
    • Global Benefits
  • Resources
    • Coronavirus Resources
    • Help Center
    • Blog
    • Webinars
    • Compliance Calendar
    • Employer HIPAA Training
    • Pre-Tax Resources
  • About
    • About Vita
    • Leadership Team
    • Vita Culture
    • Giving Back
    • Careers
  • Login
  • Contact Us
        • All
        • Blogs
  • Your Employee Benefits Partner
  • Blogs
  • The Vita Blog
  • August 2022

The Vita Blog August 2022

  1. Healthcare Provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act

    System Administrator – Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:00:00 GMT – 0
    President Biden signed the Inflation Reduction Act into law this week. The bill’s primary focus is climate change and economic issues. However, there are important healthcare issues included, and pundits across the board characterize the healthcare provisions of the bill as the most significant changes in healthcare policy since the passage of the Affordable Care Act. Following is a short rundown on the healthcare provisions of the bill.
     

    Rx Pricing Negotiation

    The bill empowers the Centers for Medicare Services (CMS) to negotiate drug prices under Medicare. CMS will be able to negotiate prices for ten high-cost drugs starting in 2026 (15 in 2027 and 20 in 2029 and beyond). While considered a modest start, this approach will allow time to see whether price negotiation negatively affects drug development and stifles new drugs coming to the market (the major criticisms from the pharmaceutical industry).
     

    $35 Cap on Insulin

    The out-of-pocket cost of insulin will be capped at $35 for individuals under Medicare. The bill initially included a cap on the out-of-pocket cost of insulin for all Americans. However, expanding the cap to a greater commercial marketplace was stripped out of the bill by the Senate parliamentarian. In order to pass the bill by a simple majority, all provisions must relate directly to the federal budget, and it was determined the expanded cap did meet that standard, so it could not be part of a reconciliation-eligible (filibuster-proof) bill.
     

    $2,000 Hard Cap on Medicare Part D

    Redesigning Medicare Part D benefits to cap out-of-pocket costs has received wide support. The cap in the bill contains a $2,000 “hard” cap on out-of-pocket costs for prescription drugs under Medicare Part D. This provision becomes effective in 2025, and the cap will be indexed in future years.
     

    Extension of ACA Premium Subsidies

    Supplemental ACA premium subsidies for low-income individuals, which were implemented as part of the 2021 American Rescue Plan Act, were set to expire at the end of 2022. This would have increased out-of-pocket premium payments across the board for virtually all 13 million subsidized enrollees. The bill extended the enhanced premium subsidies for three years.
     

    Impact on Employer Plans – Higher Costs

    The healthcare provisions of the Inflation Reduction Act prompt a key question for employers: How will employer plan costs be impacted?

    In short, the cost savings for Medicare and for individuals covered under Medicare will likely be borne by employer health plans (and individual health plans). As Medicare negotiates “savings” in drug costs for Medicare recipients and for the federal government, we can expect a cost shift where that savings will be to be shifted to employer plans, self-funded plans, and individual plans. Drug manufacturers will receive lower revenue on the Medicare side (due to the CMS negotiation power), so we can expect that higher prices will be charged to commercial plans to compensate for the lost revenue.
  2. Changes to San Francisco Family Friendly Workplace Ordinance

    System Administrator – Tue, 09 Aug 2022 15:00:00 GMT – 0

    The San Francisco Family Friendly Workplace Ordinance (FFWO) has recently been amended and expanded. The new law gives certain employees the right to request flexible or predictable work arrangements to assist with caregiving responsibilities.
     

    Covered Employers

    Employers with 20 or more employees (anywhere in the world) are covered by the law. The business location must be within the geographic boundaries of the City of San Francisco and County of San Francisco. A business location is defined as any physical space used for the business to run its operations.
     

    Covered Employees

    Employees are covered by the law if they are:

    • Employed in San Francisco
    • Have been employed for six (6) months or more by the current employer, and
    • Work at least eight (8) hours per week on a regular basis within the geographic boundaries of San Francisco
     

    What about teleworking?

    An employee is covered if they are assigned to a San Francisco business location at the time the request is made regardless of where they are physically working. An employee is not covered if they were never assigned to the San Francisco office.

    Example #1: The employer has offices in San Francisco, Burlingame, and Hayward. An employee works from their home in San Mateo. If they were to work “onsite,” they would be assigned to work in the Burlingame office. The employee is not covered by the FFWO even though they work for an Employer who has an office in San Francisco. 

    Example #2: In 2019, Employee A works at the San Francisco office. In 2020, Employee A begins to telework from Oregon and is assigned to the SF office. Employee A is covered under FFWO. In 2021, Employee B lives in Nebraska and was hired into a telework position assigned to the New York Office. The employer has a business location in SF. Employee B is not covered under FFWO.
     

    How is caregiving defined? 

    Covered employees may request a flexible or predictable working arrangement to assist with care for any of the following:

    • A child or children for whom the employee has assumed parental responsibility
    • A person or persons with a serious health condition in a family relationship with the employee
    • A person who is age 65 or older in a family relationship with the employee.
     

    Family Relationship means a relationship in which a caregiver is related by blood, legal custody, marriage, or domestic partnership to another person as a spouse, domestic partner, child parent, sibling, grandchild, or grandparent.
     

    Verification Rules

    An employee’s attestation of caregiving duties may suffice, but employers can request verification within limits. Employers may ask the employee to provide a note confirming the obligation (e.g. medical appointment is on Tuesdays at 3:00 p.m.). Employers may not ask for confirmation about the reason for the appointment or extraneous verification, such as from the employee’s family members that they are unavailable to assist, when there is no basis to believe that the employee’s attestation is invalid.
     

    Regular Schedule Request vs. FFWO Request

    Example #3: An employee receives their schedule every two weeks and is required to make a scheduling request on the Friday before the schedule is posted. On the first of the month, the employee requests not to be scheduled for the night shift on the twelfth of the month. The manager hears from a co-worker that the employee’s request is to attend his son’s dance recital. Is this a valid FFWO request? Or is this a regular scheduling request?

    The employee’s request is not considered a notice of need for a flexible or predictable working arrangement under the FFWO since he did not expressly disclose that his need is due to his ongoing caregiving responsibilities and rather it relates to a singular occasion. Also, the request was not made in a timely manner (i.e. it did not afford the employer 21 calendar days to respond). This request should be regarded and addressed as a regular scheduling request.
     

    Effective Date

    The changes to the ordinance are effective as of July 12, 2022. 

  3. IRS Updates ACA Affordability Threshold

    System Administrator – Mon, 08 Aug 2022 15:00:00 GMT – 0
    The IRS issued Revenue Procedure 2022-34 which announces the 2023 indexing adjustment percentage for determining the affordability threshold for employer-sponsored health insurance coverage under the ACA.

    The percentage is adjusted annually for inflation, and the 2023 threshold decreased substantially from 9.61% to 9.12%. The new percentage applies for plan years beginning in 2023.
     

    Impact on Employers

    Recall that under the ACA provisions, employer-sponsored coverage will only be considered affordable if an employee’s required contribution of the lowest-cost self-only coverage does not exceed 9.12% of the employee’s household income for the tax year. The reduction in percentage will require higher employer contributions in order to keep plans affordable at the lower 9.12% rate. Neglecting to offer affordable, minimum value coverage to full-time employees could result in penalties under the Pay or Play provisions of the ACA.
     

    How Does the Math Work?

    There are two different safe harbor calculation methods that employers can use:

    Federal Poverty Line Affordability Safe Harbor: Under the FPL method, the employee contribution for the lowest cost plan (for full-time employees) cannot exceed $103.28 per month. This reflects 9.12% of the Federal Poverty Level which is $13,590 in 2023 for one person. Using the FPL Affordability Safe Harbor automatically deems coverage affordable for all full-time employees and permits the employer to use the qualifying offer method for streamlined ACA reporting.

    Rate of Pay Affordability Safe Harbor: Under the Rate of Pay method, employers must do the math to confirm that the employee contribution for lowest cost plan (for full-time employees) cannot exceed 9.12% of the lowest hourly rate of pay (x 30 hours per week) and the lowest monthly salary. States with higher minimum wage requirements will benefit from using the Rate of Pay method. For example, the California minimum wage of $15.00 creates a maximum contribution of $177.84 per month ($15/hour x 30 hours per week x 52 weeks x 9.12% ¸ 12).
     

    Contribution Strategy

    While the FPL method yields a lower required employee contribution, the calculation process is much simpler. The Rate of Pay method will often allow for a higher employee contribution (for the lowest cost plan). However, the calculations must be customized to actual employee rates of pay within each organization and within each region if different plans are made available to different populations. 

    2023 Contribution Strategy Considerations: Consider the ACA affordability safe harbor requirements when designing 2023 employee contribution levels to avoid potential employer mandate “B Penalty” liability. Where possible within budgetary constraints, employers should prepare to offer at least one medical plan option to full-time employees in all regions with an employee share of the premium not exceeding $103.28/month for employee-only coverage to simplify affordability compliance under the federal poverty line safe harbor.
  • ‹ Newer
  • Older ›

The Vita Blog

Options

Blog Home Feed

Archive

September 2023 6 June 2023 2 May 2023 5 April 2023 7 March 2023 1 February 2023 5 January 2023 1 November 2022 1 October 2022 1 September 2022 1 August 2022 3 May 2022 2 March 2022 1 February 2022 3 January 2022 1 December 2021 1 November 2021 2 September 2021 1 August 2021 2 July 2021 1 June 2021 2 May 2021 2 April 2021 1 March 2021 3 February 2021 1 December 2020 3 November 2020 3 October 2020 2 September 2020 1 June 2020 3 May 2020 1 April 2020 2 March 2020 3 February 2020 1 December 2019 2 November 2019 2 October 2019 2 September 2019 1 August 2019 1 July 2019 1 June 2019 2 March 2019 2 February 2019 1 December 2018 1 November 2018 4 October 2018 3 August 2018 2 May 2018 1 April 2018 3 March 2018 4 February 2018 5 January 2018 6 December 2017 2 November 2017 1 October 2017 3 September 2017 2 August 2017 2 July 2017 2 May 2017 1 March 2017 1 February 2017 4 January 2017 4 December 2016 1 November 2016 4 September 2016 4 July 2016 2 May 2016 2 April 2016 1 March 2016 3 February 2016 2 September 2015 1 August 2015 1 June 2015 2 April 2015 1 February 2015 1 January 2015 1 November 2014 1 September 2014 1
  • Vita

    • 1451 Grant Road, Suite 200
    • Mountain View, CA 94040
    • (650) 966-1492
  • Solutions

    • Employee Benefits
    • COBRA
    • Pre-Tax Administration
    • Retirement
    • Global Benefits
  • Resources

    • Coronavirus Resources
    • Help Center
    • Blog
    • Webinars
    • Compliance Calendar
    • Pre-Tax Resources

Privacy Policy | Form ADV Part 2A | Insurance offered through Vita Insurance Associates, Inc. (CA Insurance License #0581175 | DBA Vita Companies)

Investment advisory services offered through Vita Planning Group LLC, a Registered Investment Advisor with the SEC.

Check the background of your financial professional on FINRA'S BROKERCHECK

This site is published for residents of the United States only. Representatives may only conduct business with residents of the states and jurisdictions in which they are properly registered. Therefore, a response to a request for information may be delayed until appropriate registration is obtained or exemption from registration is determined. Not all of services referenced on this site are available in every state and through every advisor listed.

Vita Planning Group LLC understands and attests that they are an ERISA fiduciary as defined in the Fiduciary Rule under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Vita Planning Group LLC adheres to the Impartial Conduct Standards (including the “best interest” standard, reasonable compensation and no misrepresented information). This relates to all ERISA accounts including Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs).

BrokerCheck by FINRA

Copyright © 2023 Vita Insurance Associates, Inc. All Rights Reserved. | Privacy Policy